Why Choosing the Cheapest Property Manager Could Be a Costly Mistake
Hi, I’m Jason, a Business Journalist at Bukit Vista, and today I’ll be exploring a critical but often overlooked aspect of real estate investment—how to evaluate property management agreements. This article is based on insights from the Bali Business Review, as presented in the recent video titled “Why the Cheapest Property Manager Can Cost You More.”
If you’re a property owner or investor considering how to choose a management partner, it’s tempting to be swayed by the lowest advertised management fee. But as Jing highlights, this approach can be dangerously shortsighted. The real question isn’t “Which company has the lowest fee?” but rather, “Who is going to put more money in my bank account at the end of the year?”
Don’t Just Look at the Sticker Price
Property management or property manager companies often advertise headline rates—say 10% or 20%—as a way to appeal to cost-conscious investors. But just like buying a car or a flight, the sticker price doesn’t always reflect the total value. A lower management fee could come with limited services, poor guest experiences, slow response times, or ineffective revenue optimization. All of which ultimately hurt your bottom line.
On the flip side, a higher upfront fee might give you access to:
- Expert pricing strategies that significantly boost occupancy and nightly rates
- Superior guest management that leads to better reviews and repeat bookings
- Proactive maintenance reducing the chances of costly repairs
- Data-driven decision-making and revenue reporting
In other words, a “more expensive” manager could actually earn you more money through better performance and efficiency.
Example: The Hidden Cost of a Cheap Property Manager
Let’s consider two hypothetical property managers for your Bali villa:
- Property Manager A: Charges 15%, earns you $100,000 gross income → You receive $85,000.
- Property Manager B: Charges 25%, earns you $130,000 gross income → You receive $97,500.
Even though Property Manager B has a higher fee, your net performance is significantly greater—nearly $12,500 more in your pocket. That’s the power of looking beyond the headline rate.
How to Evaluate Net Performance of Property Manager
If you’re assessing property management companies, here’s what you should examine beyond the fee schedule:
- Revenue Growth: Does the manager use data and technology to boost occupancy and pricing?
- Guest Experience: Are they creating memorable stays that lead to repeat visitors and strong reviews?
- Operational Transparency: Are you getting regular reports and insights?
- Maintenance and Cost Control: Are there systems in place that prevent expensive damages or losses?
These aspects directly impact your net income—even if they don’t show up in the contract fee line item.
The Takeaway: Focus on What You Keep
Ultimately, your goal as a property owner isn’t just to save money, it’s to make money. That’s why scrutinizing net performance—not just the contract rate—is the smartest financial move you can make. Equip yourself with the right data, ask the right questions, and choose a partner that delivers more than they charge.
Let’s Talk Real Numbers—Watch the Video
If this message resonates with you or if you’re currently evaluating management proposals, be sure to watch full breakdown in the video below. It’s loaded with deeper analysis and real-world insights.
Do you agree that net performance trumps headline fees? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments—we’d love to hear your perspective.
Jason, Business Journalist at Bukit Vista
Take the First Step to Joining Our Community, Book Your Seat at Our Round Table Talk Today!
At Bukit Vista, we believe in creating lasting partnerships that help nagivate your property to the top 1% in this competitive season. Join us to discover how we can work together.
